In the face of a deep, global economic contraction in the first half of 2020, prices of industrial metals have been remarkably resilient. Copper has rebounded to pre-pandemic levels at the start of the year, and while aluminium prices are lower than at the start of 2020, they are well off their recent lows (Figure 1). Iron ore prices, too, are higher so far this year but steel has fallen significantly (Figure 2).
The resilience of most industrial metals is somewhat surprising considering how supply has grown in recent decades. Compared to the 1990s, the world is awash in industrial metals. Over the past quarter century, annual output from copper mines has increased 112%. Steel production is up 162%. Aluminium and iron ore mining supply has increased by 235% and 243%, respectively, since 1994 (Figure 3). Given the sharp decline in economic activity, one might have expected industrial metals prices to fall substantially as a result of the pandemic. So, what has been supporting prices?
The impact of reduced global demand is being partially offset by a coronavirus-related supply shock across the metals sector. In South Africa, the world’s deepest gold mine was shut in March after 170 workers tested positive for COVID-19. Similarly, copper mines were shut in Peru and Zambia in March and April for the same reason. A large Chilean copper mine at Chuquicamata halted production in June, when Brazil’s largest iron ore miner suspended 10% of its production amid a coronavirus outbreak at one of its mines. Moreover, mining companies are putting off investment in new mining operations as global travel is dramatically curtailed, amid fears of fresh coronavirus outbreaks and a potentially slow recovery in global demand.
In essence, copper and other industrial metals are caught in a tug of war: coronavirus outbreaks threaten both demand and supply. If and when the pandemic fades, both demand and supply could rebound.
Industrial metals may also be vulnerable to developments in the building sector. If office construction slows significantly as a result of post-pandemic changes to work habits, that could put a bearish tilt on demand.
China is the single most important source of demand for industrial metals. It buys between 40% and 50% of the world’s raw aluminium, copper and steel while using nearly two-thirds of the world’s iron ore. These figures, however, exaggerate somewhat China’s role in these markets. While China buys a large share of raw materials, about one-third to half of its purchases are re-exported as components in intermediate or finished goods.
China reports its second quarter GDP data on July 16. After the first quarter’s 6.8% contraction, the Q2 number is expected to be positive. Nearly all Chinese indicators show a rebound in activity during the second quarter, including a narrow gauge of economic activity that correlates highly with commodity markets called the Li Keqiang index. The index is composed of three factors: bank loans (40%), electricity production (40%) and rail freight (20%).
Unlike China’s official GDP, the Li Keqiang index has not showed negative growth during China’s pandemic shutdown, merely a slowing of growth from 8.9% YoY in December to 0.9% in January. Since then, growth improved to 2.3% YoY in February, 2.2% in March, 3.3% in April and 6.6% in May (Figure 4). By this measure, the slowdown in China’s industrial growth has actually been less severe and less prolonged than that in 2014 and 2015. While the rebound in the Li Keqiang index and the probable return to positive GDP growth in Q2 are positives for industrial metals, demand beyond China’s borders probably remains quite weak and this will likely impair China’s export growth for months to com
Over the past 15 years, industrial metals have shown a high correlation with Chinese growth – but often with a significant lag of up to 18 months (six quarters) (Figures 5 and 6). If experience is any guide, the true impact of the coronavirus on metals demand may not become fully apparent for six months to a year, or more. As such, the dip in Chinese and global demand in Q1 and Q2 2020 could impact prices well in to 2021.
Erik Norland is Executive Director and Senior Economist of CME Group. He is responsible for generating economic analysis on global financial markets by identifying emerging trends, evaluating economic factors and forecasting their impact on CME Group and the company’s business strategy, and upon those who trade in its various markets. He is also one of CME Group’s spokespeople on global economic, financial and geopolitical conditions.
View more reports from Erik Norland, Executive Director and Senior Economist of CME Group.
Manage price risk with our comprehensive suite of COMEX and NYMEX Metals options, including our short-term Gold options and monthly Gold, Platinum, Palladium, Iron Ore, and Copper options to increase your flexibility while trading the world's most liquid metals market.