| Crop Conditions Summary | |||||||||
| Corn: Crop Condition | |||||||||
| GoodExcellent | 05/25 | 05/18 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 68 | - | - | - | 72 | 78(2007) | 63(2005) | 179.3 | 95.326 |
| Iowa | 83 | - | - | - | 81 | 84(1987) | 60(2000) | 211.0 | 13.500 |
| Illinois | 67 | - | - | - | 68 | 87(1986) | 55(2020) | 217.0 | 11.100 |
| Nebraska | 70 | - | - | - | 72 | 87(2007) | 58(1992) | 188.0 | 10.600 |
| Minnesota | 69 | - | - | - | 76 | 88(2010) | 52(2005) | 174.0 | 8.600 |
| Spring Wheat: Crop Condition | |||||||||
| GoodExcellent | 05/25 | 05/18 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 45 | - | - | - | 63 | 88(1986) | 34(1988) | 46.2 | 11.270 |
| North Dakota | 37 | - | - | - | 63 | 92(1991) | 31(2021) | 50.0 | 5.600 |
| Montana | 36 | - | - | - | 65 | 94(1986) | 23(2001) | 25.0 | 2.450 |
| Minnesota | 82 | - | - | - | 74 | 93(2010) | 38(1988) | 61.0 | 1.550 |
| South Dakota | 55 | - | - | - | 56 | 98(1991) | 30(1988) | 48.0 | 0.720 |
| Winter Wheat: Crop Condition | |||||||||
| GoodExcellent | 05/25 | 05/18 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 50 | 52 | -2 | 48 | 47 | 75(1993) | 27(1989) | 47.0 | 33.805 |
| Kansas | 48 | 49 | -1 | 32 | 37 | 91(1993) | 5(1989) | 37.0 | 7.700 |
| Texas | 26 | 32 | -6 | 36 | 34 | 70(2007) | 3(2006) | 30.0 | 5.700 |
| Oklahoma | 46 | 56 | -10 | 53 | 43 | 90(1990) | 4(2011) | 28.0 | 4.350 |
| Colorado | 51 | 46 | +5 | 42 | 46 | 84(1999) | 8(2002) | 25.0 | 2.100 |
| Crop Progress Summary | |||||||||
| Corn: Percent Planted | |||||||||
| Planted | 05/25 | 05/18 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 87 | 78 | +9 | 81 | 84 | 96(2007) | 57(2019) | 179.3 | 95.326 |
| Iowa | 95 | 91 | +4 | 87 | 92 | 100(1994) | 69(1991) | 211.0 | 13.500 |
| Illinois | 82 | 74 | +8 | 78 | 85 | 99(2018) | 33(2019) | 217.0 | 11.100 |
| Nebraska | 95 | 86 | +9 | 89 | 91 | 100(1994) | 45(1982) | 188.0 | 10.600 |
| Minnesota | 97 | 92 | +5 | 88 | 88 | 99(2010) | 65(2019) | 174.0 | 8.600 |
| Cotton: Percent Planted | |||||||||
| Planted | 05/25 | 05/18 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 52 | 40 | +12 | 57 | 55 | 80(2006) | 49(2015) | 947.0 | 11.670 |
| Texas | 47 | 35 | +12 | 48 | 45 | 69(1990) | 31(2015) | 796.0 | 6.430 |
| Georgia | 58 | 41 | +17 | 61 | 65 | 94(1985) | 53(2007) | 975.0 | 1.100 |
| Arkansas | 74 | 60 | +14 | 83 | 85 | 99(2012) | 68(2003) | 1196.0 | 0.670 |
| Mississippi | 43 | 31 | +12 | 82 | 77 | 99(1997) | 34(2013) | 1079.0 | 0.520 |
| Soybeans: Percent Planted | |||||||||
| Planted | 05/25 | 05/18 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 76 | 66 | +10 | 66 | 63 | 85(2012) | 23(1990) | 50.7 | 83.495 |
| Illinois | 75 | 67 | +8 | 70 | 66 | 92(2005) | 6(1995) | 64.0 | 10.500 |
| Iowa | 92 | 84 | +8 | 71 | 75 | 97(2000) | 15(1982) | 60.0 | 9.600 |
| Minnesota | 91 | 81 | +10 | 69 | 73 | 98(2021) | 27(1982) | 45.0 | 7.000 |
| North Dakota | 58 | 46 | +12 | 49 | 53 | 91(2012) | 14(2022) | 37.5 | 6.200 |
| Spring Wheat: Percent Planted | |||||||||
| Planted | 05/25 | 05/18 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 87 | 82 | +5 | 87 | 83 | 99(1985) | 59(2022) | 46.2 | 11.270 |
| North Dakota | 84 | 78 | +6 | 82 | 77 | 95(2021) | 41(2022) | 50.0 | 5.600 |
| Montana | 82 | 76 | +6 | 87 | 86 | 99(1985) | 53(2011) | 25.0 | 2.450 |
| Minnesota | 97 | 93 | +4 | 95 | 84 | 100(2021) | 29(2022) | 61.0 | 1.550 |
| South Dakota | 100 | 99 | +1 | 98 | 95 | 100(2017) | 76(1995) | 48.0 | 0.720 |
| US Crop Progress Estimates as of May 25, 2025 | |||||
| Estimates | Previous | ||||
| Hightower | Range | Last Week | Last Year | ||
| Progress - Percent Completed | |||||
| Corn Planted | 87 | 83 - 91 | 78 | 83 | |
| Soybeans Planted | 77 | 70 - 80 | 66 | 68 | |
| Spring Wheat Planted | 91 | 88 - 95 | 82 | 88 | |
| Conditions - Percent Good/Excellent | |||||
| Corn Condition | 73 | 64 - 78 | - | - | |
| Spring Wheat Condition | 70 | 63 - 76 | - | - | |
| Winter Wheat Condition | 52 | 50 - 54 | 52 | 48 | |
Highlights
Crop Conditions
Winter Wheat
Winter Wheat rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 25 was down 2% at 50% and poor / very poor was up 1% at 19%. Current G/EX is up 3% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is down 3% versus the 10 year average. Of the 18 reported states 7 reported better, 11 worse, and 0 unchanged G/EX ratings. The good / excellent ratings for the top producing states were: Kansas 48%(-1%), Washington 77%(-1%), Montana 77%(-2%), Illinois 62%(+2%), Idaho 75%(+5%).
Spring Wheat
Spring Wheat rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 25 was 45% and poor / very poor was 18%.
Corn
Corn rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 25 was 68% and poor / very poor was 5%.
Crop Progress
Cotton
Cotton planted as of May 25 was up 12% at 52%. This is down 5% versus last year and down 3% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Texas 47%(+12%), Georgia 58%(+17%), Arkansas 74%(+14%), Mississippi 43%(+12%), North Carolina 60%(+20%).
Spring Wheat
Spring Wheat planted as of May 25 was up 5% at 87%. This is unchanged versus last year and up 4% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report North Dakota 84%(+6%), Minnesota 97%(+4%), Montana 82%(+6%), South Dakota 100%(+1%), Idaho 100%(+1%).
Corn
Corn planted as of May 25 was up 9% at 87%. This is up 6% versus last year and up 3% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Iowa 95%(+4%), Illinois 82%(+8%), Nebraska 95%(+9%), Minnesota 97%(+5%), Indiana 76%(+12%).
Soybeans
Soybeans planted as of May 25 was up 10% at 76%. This is up 10% versus last year and up 13% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Illinois 75%(+8%), Iowa 92%(+8%), Indiana 71%(+12%), Minnesota 91%(+10%), Nebraska 91%(+11%).
Winter Wheat
Winter Wheat rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 25 was down 2% at 50% and poor / very poor was up 1% at 19%. Current G/EX is up 3% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is down 3% versus the 10 year average. Of the 18 reported states 7 reported better, 11 worse, and 0 unchanged G/EX ratings. The good / excellent ratings for the top producing states were: Kansas 48%(-1%), Washington 77%(-1%), Montana 77%(-2%), Illinois 62%(+2%), Idaho 75%(+5%).
Spring Wheat
Spring Wheat rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 25 was 45% and poor / very poor was 18%.
Corn
Corn rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 25 was 68% and poor / very poor was 5%.
Crop Progress
Cotton
Cotton planted as of May 25 was up 12% at 52%. This is down 5% versus last year and down 3% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Texas 47%(+12%), Georgia 58%(+17%), Arkansas 74%(+14%), Mississippi 43%(+12%), North Carolina 60%(+20%).
Spring Wheat
Spring Wheat planted as of May 25 was up 5% at 87%. This is unchanged versus last year and up 4% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report North Dakota 84%(+6%), Minnesota 97%(+4%), Montana 82%(+6%), South Dakota 100%(+1%), Idaho 100%(+1%).
Corn
Corn planted as of May 25 was up 9% at 87%. This is up 6% versus last year and up 3% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Iowa 95%(+4%), Illinois 82%(+8%), Nebraska 95%(+9%), Minnesota 97%(+5%), Indiana 76%(+12%).
Soybeans
Soybeans planted as of May 25 was up 10% at 76%. This is up 10% versus last year and up 13% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Illinois 75%(+8%), Iowa 92%(+8%), Indiana 71%(+12%), Minnesota 91%(+10%), Nebraska 91%(+11%).
Definition
This full text file contains reports, issued weekly during the growing season (April to November), which lists planting, fruiting, and harvesting progress and overall condition of selected crops in major producing states. The data, summarized by crop and by state, are republished along with any revisions in the Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin. During the months of December through March, the report is issued monthly titled State Stories.
Description
These reports offer weekly analysis of the progress and condition of the crops. State-by-state data is provided, which is aggregated into a number that covers the key producing states that make up the majority of the US crop.
Crop Progress is measured by stages and percentage of completion. This includes percent planted, percent harvested, and several stages in between. Some of the stages vary from crop to crop. For example, intermediate stages for corn include emergence, silk, dough, dent, and maturity, while the stages for soybeans include emergence, bloom, setting pods, and dropping leaves. The reports compare the current week with the same period in the previous year and with the 5-year average.
Inclement weather in the spring can delay planting, which could ultimately lower the production for that year. For corn, producers may be forced to pick faster-growing but lower-yielding seed varieties if planting gets delayed. In some cases, they may switch to soybeans, which have a shorter growing season. If it is excessively hot and dry during the corn silking stage, yields could drop, and a delayed start to the season could push silking later in the summer and increase the odds of that happening. A key stage to watch for soybeans in pod-filling, as excessively dry weather during that stage could result in smaller beans and lower yield. If the crops are late, there is an increased chance of frost before the plants have matured, which can also reduce yield.
Crop Conditions are measured by five categories: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor and Very Poor. As a rule of thumb, analysts tend to focus on the percentage that is in the good and excellent categories (“Good/Excellent”) and to a lesser extent to “Poor/Very Poor.” The reports include data on the current week, the previous week, and a year prior.
Analysts look at the weekly conditions data during the growing season to get an idea on how the crop is performing relative to previous years. If the crop conditions are poor, analysts may want to reduce their production estimates, and vice-versa if the crop conditions are strong. Analysts may also look at individual states’ conditions in light of the weather those areas are experiencing.
Crop Progress is measured by stages and percentage of completion. This includes percent planted, percent harvested, and several stages in between. Some of the stages vary from crop to crop. For example, intermediate stages for corn include emergence, silk, dough, dent, and maturity, while the stages for soybeans include emergence, bloom, setting pods, and dropping leaves. The reports compare the current week with the same period in the previous year and with the 5-year average.
Inclement weather in the spring can delay planting, which could ultimately lower the production for that year. For corn, producers may be forced to pick faster-growing but lower-yielding seed varieties if planting gets delayed. In some cases, they may switch to soybeans, which have a shorter growing season. If it is excessively hot and dry during the corn silking stage, yields could drop, and a delayed start to the season could push silking later in the summer and increase the odds of that happening. A key stage to watch for soybeans in pod-filling, as excessively dry weather during that stage could result in smaller beans and lower yield. If the crops are late, there is an increased chance of frost before the plants have matured, which can also reduce yield.
Crop Conditions are measured by five categories: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor and Very Poor. As a rule of thumb, analysts tend to focus on the percentage that is in the good and excellent categories (“Good/Excellent”) and to a lesser extent to “Poor/Very Poor.” The reports include data on the current week, the previous week, and a year prior.
Analysts look at the weekly conditions data during the growing season to get an idea on how the crop is performing relative to previous years. If the crop conditions are poor, analysts may want to reduce their production estimates, and vice-versa if the crop conditions are strong. Analysts may also look at individual states’ conditions in light of the weather those areas are experiencing.
