Crop Conditions Summary | |||||||||
Corn: Crop Condition | |||||||||
GoodExcellent | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 64 | 69 | -5 | 73 | 73 | 81(1991) | 46(1992) | 173.3 | 91.996 |
Iowa | 72 | 77 | -5 | - | 78 | 86(1994) | 48(2001) | 200 | 13.100 |
Illinois | 50 | 69 | -19 | - | 70 | 95(1986) | 29(1992) | 214 | 11.000 |
Nebraska | 63 | 62 | +1 | - | 78 | 94(1991) | 29(1989) | 165 | 9.500 |
Minnesota | 77 | 80 | -3 | - | 76 | 92(2010) | 39(1992) | 195 | 8.350 |
Cotton: Crop Condition | |||||||||
GoodExcellent | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 51 | 48 | +3 | 48 | 47 | 68(1994) | 36(1992) | 947. | 11.256 |
Texas | 31 | 28 | +3 | 26 | 34 | 81(1994) | 25(1992) | 796. | 6.235 |
Georgia | 69 | 70 | -1 | 70 | 64 | 73(1991) | 18(2007) | 975. | 1.200 |
Oklahoma | 85 | 78 | +7 | 95 | 64 | 99(1994) | 20(1989) | 348. | 0.530 |
Arkansas | 83 | 76 | +7 | 79 | 81 | 88(2021) | 4(1989) | 1196. | 0.480 |
Soybeans: Crop Condition | |||||||||
GoodExcellent | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 62 | - | - | - | 73 | 75(2018) | 56(2001) | 49.5 | 87.505 |
Illinois | 51 | - | - | - | 71 | 78(2018) | 56(2001) | 63.0 | 10.800 |
Iowa | 70 | - | - | - | 81 | 82(2020) | 40(2001) | 58.5 | 10.100 |
Minnesota | 79 | - | - | - | 86 | 88(2018) | 48(2001) | 50.0 | 7.550 |
North Dakota | 69 | - | - | - | 76 | 88(2006) | 72(2020) | 35.0 | 6.550 |
Spring Wheat: Crop Condition | |||||||||
GoodExcellent | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 64 | - | - | - | 68 | 87(1991) | 23(1988) | 46.2 | 10.570 |
North Dakota | 67 | - | - | - | 69 | 91(1991) | 13(1988) | 50.0 | 5.200 |
Montana | 58 | - | - | - | 67 | 92(1986) | 19(2001) | 25.0 | 2.600 |
Minnesota | 77 | - | - | - | 78 | 95(2017) | 23(1988) | 61.0 | 1.180 |
South Dakota | 56 | - | - | - | 53 | 96(1991) | 24(2021) | 48.0 | 0.730 |
Winter Wheat: Crop Condition | |||||||||
GoodExcellent | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 36 | 34 | +2 | 30 | 45 | 72(1993) | 27(2006) | 47. | 37.505 |
Kansas | 12 | 10 | +2 | 29 | 38 | 93(1987) | 5(1989) | 37.0 | 8.100 |
Texas | 29 | 23 | +6 | 6 | 30 | 67(2007) | 2(2006) | 30.0 | 6.700 |
Oklahoma | 37 | 30 | +7 | 10 | 36 | 92(1988) | 5(2014) | 28.0 | 4.600 |
Colorado | 43 | 32 | +11 | 19 | 45 | 83(1999) | 7(2002) | 25.0 | 2.250 |
Crop Progress Summary | |||||||||
Corn: Percent Planted | |||||||||
Planted | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 96 | 92 | +4 | 93 | - | 99(1985) | 72(2019) | 173.3 | 91.996 |
Iowa | 100 | 98 | +2 | 97 | - | 100(2016) | 79(1982) | 200 | 13.100 |
Illinois | 96 | 95 | +1 | 94 | - | 100(1982) | 53(2019) | 214 | 11.000 |
Nebraska | 97 | 96 | +1 | 98 | - | 100(2020) | 59(1982) | 165 | 9.500 |
Minnesota | 98 | 93 | +5 | 91 | - | 100(2020) | 81(2019) | 195 | 8.350 |
Cotton: Percent Planted | |||||||||
Planted | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 71 | 60 | +11 | 82 | 76 | 93(2006) | 69(2021) | 947. | 11.256 |
Texas | 60 | 50 | +10 | 79 | 69 | 86(2006) | 58(2021) | 796. | 6.235 |
Georgia | 83 | 68 | +15 | 84 | 84 | 100(1985) | 69(2009) | 975. | 1.200 |
Oklahoma | 46 | 32 | +14 | 51 | 47 | 89(2004) | 22(2020) | 348. | 0.530 |
Arkansas | 100 | 94 | +6 | 96 | 97 | 100(2016) | 88(1991) | 1196. | 0.480 |
Soybeans: Percent Planted | |||||||||
Planted | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 91 | 83 | +8 | 76 | 76 | 94(2012) | 43(1995) | 49.5 | 87.505 |
Illinois | 96 | 92 | +4 | 86 | 77 | 99(1988) | 16(1995) | 63.0 | 10.800 |
Iowa | 98 | 94 | +4 | 93 | 84 | 100(2000) | 30(1982) | 58.5 | 10.100 |
Minnesota | 94 | 86 | +8 | 70 | 85 | 100(2021) | 54(1991) | 50.0 | 7.550 |
North Dakota | 79 | 53 | +26 | 38 | 76 | 98(2012) | 38(2022) | 35.0 | 6.550 |
Spring Wheat: Percent Planted | |||||||||
Planted | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 93 | 85 | +8 | 81 | - | 94(2020) | 77(2011) | 46.2 | 10.570 |
North Dakota | 92 | 79 | +13 | 72 | - | 94(2019) | 67(2011) | 50.0 | 5.200 |
Montana | 88 | 81 | +7 | 97 | - | 98(2020) | 71(2011) | 25.0 | 2.600 |
Minnesota | 98 | 97 | +1 | 63 | - | 99(1995) | 63(2022) | 61.0 | 1.180 |
South Dakota | 100 | 99 | +1 | 98 | - | 100(2020) | 89(2019) | 48.0 | 0.730 |
Winter Wheat: Percent Harvested | |||||||||
Harvested | 06/04 | 05/28 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
Select States | 4 | - | - | 5 | - | 22(2012) | 2(2016) | 47. | 37.505 |
Kansas | 0 | - | - | 0 | - | 25(2012) | 0(2022) | 37.0 | 8.100 |
Texas | 29 | 18 | +11 | 34 | 30 | 58(2017) | 7(1992) | 30.0 | 6.700 |
Oklahoma | 15 | 0 | +15 | 14 | 11 | 75(2012) | 2(2021) | 28.0 | 4.600 |
Colorado | 0 | - | - | 0 | - | 0(2022) | 0(2022) | 25.0 | 2.250 |
US Crop Progress Estimates as of Jun 04, 2023 | |||||
Estimates | Previous | ||||
Hightower | Range | Last Week | Last Year | ||
Progress - Percent Completed | |||||
Corn Planted | 97 | 96 - 98 | 92 | 94 | |
Soybeans Planted | 92 | 89 - 95 | 83 | 78 | |
Spring Wheat Planted | 93 | 90 - 96 | 85 | 82 | |
Winter Wheat Harvested | 3 | 1 - 5 | - | 5 | |
Conditions - Percent Good/Excellent | |||||
Corn Condition | 67 | 64 - 69 | 69 | 73 | |
Soybean Condition | 65 | 58 - 68 | - | - | |
Spring Wheat Condition | 70 | 67 - 77 | - | - | |
Winter Wheat Condition | 35 | 32 - 36 | 34 | 30 | |
Highlights
Winter Wheat
Winter Wheat rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of June 04 was up 2% at 36% and poor / very poor was down 1% at 34%. Current G/EX is down 9% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is up 9% versus the 10 year average. Of the 18 reported states 10 reported better, 5 worse, and 3 unchanged G/EX ratings. The good / excellent ratings for the top producing states were: Kansas 12%(+2%), Texas 29%(+6%), Oklahoma 37%(+7%), Colorado 43%(+11%), Montana 58%(0%).
Spring Wheat
Spring Wheat rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of June 04 was 64% and poor / very poor was 2%.
Corn
Corn rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of June 04 was down 5% at 64% and poor / very poor was up 1% at 6%. Current G/EX is down 9% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is up 2% versus the 10 year average. Of the 18 reported states 4 reported better, 13 worse, and 1 unchanged G/EX ratings. The good / excellent ratings for the top producing states were: Iowa 72%(-5%), Illinois 50%(-19%), Nebraska 63%(+1%), Minnesota 77%(-3%), South Dakota 65%(0%).
Soybeans
Soybeans rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of June 04 was 62% and poor / very poor was 7%.
Cotton
Cotton rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of June 04 was up 3% at 51% and poor / very poor was down 1% at 12%. Current G/EX is up 4% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is down 1% versus the 10 year average. Of the 15 reported states 7 reported better, 6 worse, and 2 unchanged G/EX ratings. The good / excellent ratings for the top producing states were: Texas 31%(+3%), Georgia 69%(-1%), Oklahoma 85%(+7%), Arkansas 83%(+7%), Alabama 83%(-6%).
Crop Progress
Winter Wheat
Winter Wheat harvested as of June 04 4%. This is down 1% versus last year.
Cotton
Cotton planted as of June 04 was up 11% at 71%. This is down 11% versus last year and down 5% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Texas 60%(+10%), Georgia 83%(+15%), Oklahoma 46%(+14%), Arkansas 100%(+6%), Alabama 90%(+11%).
Spring Wheat
Spring Wheat planted as of June 04 was up 8% at 93%. This is up 12% versus last year. The top producing states report North Dakota 92%(+13%), Montana 88%(+7%), Minnesota 98%(+1%), South Dakota 100%(+1%), Washington 100%(0%).
Corn
Corn planted as of June 04 was up 4% at 96%. This is up 3% versus last year. The top producing states report Iowa 100%(+2%), Illinois 96%(+1%), Nebraska 97%(+1%), Minnesota 98%(+5%), South Dakota 97%(+5%).
Soybeans
Soybeans planted as of June 04 was up 8% at 91%. This is up 15% versus last year and up 15% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Illinois 96%(+4%), Iowa 98%(+4%), Minnesota 94%(+8%), North Dakota 79%(+26%), Missouri 91%(+5%).
Definition
Description
Crop Progress is measured by stages and percentage of completion. This includes percent planted, percent harvested, and several stages in between. Some of the stages vary from crop to crop. For example, intermediate stages for corn include emergence, silk, dough, dent, and maturity, while the stages for soybeans include emergence, bloom, setting pods, and dropping leaves. The reports compare the current week with the same period in the previous year and with the 5-year average.
Inclement weather in the spring can delay planting, which could ultimately lower the production for that year. For corn, producers may be forced to pick faster-growing but lower-yielding seed varieties if planting gets delayed. In some cases, they may switch to soybeans, which have a shorter growing season. If it is excessively hot and dry during the corn silking stage, yields could drop, and a delayed start to the season could push silking later in the summer and increase the odds of that happening. A key stage to watch for soybeans in pod-filling, as excessively dry weather during that stage could result in smaller beans and lower yield. If the crops are late, there is an increased chance of frost before the plants have matured, which can also reduce yield.
Crop Conditions are measured by five categories: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor and Very Poor. As a rule of thumb, analysts tend to focus on the percentage that is in the good and excellent categories (“Good/Excellent”) and to a lesser extent to “Poor/Very Poor.” The reports include data on the current week, the previous week, and a year prior.
Analysts look at the weekly conditions data during the growing season to get an idea on how the crop is performing relative to previous years. If the crop conditions are poor, analysts may want to reduce their production estimates, and vice-versa if the crop conditions are strong. Analysts may also look at individual states’ conditions in light of the weather those areas are experiencing.