| Crop Conditions Summary | |||||||||
| Corn: Crop Condition | |||||||||
| GoodExcellent | 05/28 | 05/21 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 69 | - | - | 73 | 73 | 79(2018) | 47(2002) | 173.3 | 91.996 |
| Iowa | 77 | - | - | - | 79 | 83(2020) | 58(2001) | 200 | 13.100 |
| Illinois | 69 | - | - | - | 67 | 91(1986) | 32(2002) | 214 | 11.000 |
| Nebraska | 62 | - | - | - | 76 | 86(2007) | 53(1992) | 165 | 9.500 |
| Minnesota | 80 | - | - | - | 77 | 91(2010) | 42(2002) | 195 | 8.350 |
| Cotton: Crop Condition | |||||||||
| GoodExcellent | 05/28 | 05/21 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 48 | - | - | 44 | 44 | 62(1994) | 43(2006) | 947. | 11.256 |
| Texas | 28 | - | - | - | - | 77(1995) | 27(2006) | 796. | 6.235 |
| Georgia | 70 | - | - | - | - | 66(2005) | 16(1986) | 975. | 1.200 |
| Oklahoma | 78 | - | - | - | - | 94(1994) | 40(2006) | 348. | 0.530 |
| Arkansas | 76 | - | - | - | - | 77(1986) | 30(1994) | 1196. | 0.480 |
| Winter Wheat: Crop Condition | |||||||||
| GoodExcellent | 05/28 | 05/21 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 34 | 31 | +3 | 29 | 45 | 73(1993) | 28(2006) | 47. | 37.505 |
| Kansas | 10 | 10 | 0 | 28 | 38 | 91(1993) | 5(1989) | 37.0 | 8.100 |
| Texas | 23 | 23 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 70(2007) | 3(2006) | 30.0 | 6.700 |
| Oklahoma | 30 | 10 | +20 | 8 | 37 | 90(1990) | 3(2011) | 28.0 | 4.600 |
| Colorado | 32 | 29 | +3 | 17 | 44 | 83(1999) | 7(2002) | 25.0 | 2.250 |
| Crop Progress Summary | |||||||||
| Corn: Percent Planted | |||||||||
| Planted | 05/28 | 05/21 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 92 | 81 | +11 | 84 | 88 | 97(2006) | 61(2019) | 173.3 | 91.996 |
| Iowa | 98 | 95 | +3 | 93 | 94 | 100(1994) | 71(1982) | 200 | 13.100 |
| Illinois | 95 | 91 | +4 | 87 | 88 | 100(2018) | 38(2019) | 214 | 11.000 |
| Nebraska | 96 | 87 | +9 | 94 | 95 | 100(1998) | 45(1982) | 165 | 9.500 |
| Minnesota | 93 | 80 | +13 | 79 | 90 | 100(2010) | 69(2019) | 195 | 8.350 |
| Cotton: Percent Planted | |||||||||
| Planted | 05/28 | 05/21 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 60 | 45 | +15 | 66 | 62 | 85(2006) | 55(2015) | 947. | 11.256 |
| Texas | 50 | 35 | +15 | 58 | 52 | 76(1990) | 39(2015) | 796. | 6.235 |
| Georgia | 68 | 51 | +17 | 71 | 72 | 96(1985) | 58(2009) | 975. | 1.200 |
| Oklahoma | 32 | 27 | +5 | 38 | 34 | 80(2003) | 13(2020) | 348. | 0.530 |
| Arkansas | 94 | 79 | +15 | 87 | 90 | 100(2012) | 75(1991) | 1196. | 0.480 |
| Soybeans: Percent Planted | |||||||||
| Planted | 05/28 | 05/21 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 83 | 66 | +17 | 64 | 65 | 90(2012) | 29(1990) | 49.5 | 87.505 |
| Illinois | 92 | 85 | +7 | 73 | 66 | 97(2000) | 8(1995) | 63.0 | 10.800 |
| Iowa | 94 | 84 | +10 | 83 | 75 | 98(2000) | 16(1982) | 58.5 | 10.100 |
| Minnesota | 86 | 53 | +33 | 52 | 74 | 98(2021) | 39(1982) | 50.0 | 7.550 |
| North Dakota | 53 | 20 | +33 | 21 | 60 | 95(2012) | 21(2022) | 35.0 | 6.550 |
| Spring Wheat: Percent Planted | |||||||||
| Planted | 05/28 | 05/21 | Change | Last Yr. | 10 Yr. | High(Year) | Low(Year) | Yield Last | Area |
| Select States | 85 | 64 | +21 | 70 | 87 | 98(2016) | 66(2011) | 46.2 | 10.570 |
| North Dakota | 79 | 48 | +31 | 54 | 81 | 98(1989) | 52(2011) | 50.0 | 5.200 |
| Montana | 81 | 72 | +9 | 93 | 92 | 98(2005) | 58(2011) | 25.0 | 2.600 |
| Minnesota | 97 | 74 | +23 | 47 | 87 | 100(2021) | 47(2022) | 61.0 | 1.180 |
| South Dakota | 99 | 95 | +4 | 97 | 96 | 100(2021) | 81(2019) | 48.0 | 0.730 |
| US Crop Progress Estimates as of May 28, 2023 | |||||
| Estimates | Previous | ||||
| Hightower | Range | Last Week | Last Year | ||
| Progress - Percent Completed | |||||
| Corn Planted | 93 | 91 - 94 | 81 | 86 | |
| Soybeans Planted | 82 | 76 - 84 | 66 | 66 | |
| Spring Wheat Planted | 80 | 76 - 88 | 64 | 73 | |
| Conditions - Percent Good/Excellent | |||||
| Winter Wheat Condition | 31 | 30 - 32 | 31 | 29 | |
| Corn Condition | 70 | 67 - 72 | - | - | |
Highlights
Crop Conditions
Winter Wheat
Winter Wheat rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 28 was up 3% at 34% and poor / very poor was down 5% at 35%. Current G/EX is down 11% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is up 10% versus the 10 year average. Of the 18 reported states 9 reported better, 7 worse, and 2 unchanged G/EX ratings. The good / excellent ratings for the top producing states were: Kansas 10%(0%), Texas 23%(0%), Oklahoma 30%(+20%), Colorado 32%(+3%), Montana 58%(+9%).
Corn
Corn rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 28 was 69% and poor / very poor was 5%. Current G/EX is down 4% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is up 1% versus the 10 year average.
Cotton
Cotton rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 28 was 48% and poor / very poor was 13%. Current G/EX is up 4% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is down 5% versus the 10 year average.
Crop Progress
Cotton
Cotton planted as of May 28 was up 15% at 60%. This is down 6% versus last year and down 2% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Texas 50%(+15%), Georgia 68%(+17%), Oklahoma 32%(+5%), Arkansas 94%(+15%), Alabama 79%(+12%).
Spring Wheat
Spring Wheat planted as of May 28 was up 21% at 85%. This is up 15% versus last year and down 2% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report North Dakota 79%(+31%), Montana 81%(+9%), Minnesota 97%(+23%), South Dakota 99%(+4%), Washington 100%(+2%).
Corn
Corn planted as of May 28 was up 11% at 92%. This is up 8% versus last year and up 4% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Iowa 98%(+3%), Illinois 95%(+4%), Nebraska 96%(+9%), Minnesota 93%(+13%), South Dakota 92%(+16%).
Soybeans
Soybeans planted as of May 28 was up 17% at 83%. This is up 19% versus last year and up 18% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Illinois 92%(+7%), Iowa 94%(+10%), Minnesota 86%(+33%), North Dakota 53%(+33%), Missouri 86%(+12%).
Winter Wheat
Winter Wheat rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 28 was up 3% at 34% and poor / very poor was down 5% at 35%. Current G/EX is down 11% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is up 10% versus the 10 year average. Of the 18 reported states 9 reported better, 7 worse, and 2 unchanged G/EX ratings. The good / excellent ratings for the top producing states were: Kansas 10%(0%), Texas 23%(0%), Oklahoma 30%(+20%), Colorado 32%(+3%), Montana 58%(+9%).
Corn
Corn rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 28 was 69% and poor / very poor was 5%. Current G/EX is down 4% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is up 1% versus the 10 year average.
Cotton
Cotton rated good / excellent (G/EX) as of May 28 was 48% and poor / very poor was 13%. Current G/EX is up 4% versus the 10 year average and Poor / Very Poor is down 5% versus the 10 year average.
Crop Progress
Cotton
Cotton planted as of May 28 was up 15% at 60%. This is down 6% versus last year and down 2% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Texas 50%(+15%), Georgia 68%(+17%), Oklahoma 32%(+5%), Arkansas 94%(+15%), Alabama 79%(+12%).
Spring Wheat
Spring Wheat planted as of May 28 was up 21% at 85%. This is up 15% versus last year and down 2% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report North Dakota 79%(+31%), Montana 81%(+9%), Minnesota 97%(+23%), South Dakota 99%(+4%), Washington 100%(+2%).
Corn
Corn planted as of May 28 was up 11% at 92%. This is up 8% versus last year and up 4% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Iowa 98%(+3%), Illinois 95%(+4%), Nebraska 96%(+9%), Minnesota 93%(+13%), South Dakota 92%(+16%).
Soybeans
Soybeans planted as of May 28 was up 17% at 83%. This is up 19% versus last year and up 18% versus the 10 year average. The top producing states report Illinois 92%(+7%), Iowa 94%(+10%), Minnesota 86%(+33%), North Dakota 53%(+33%), Missouri 86%(+12%).
Definition
This full text file contains reports, issued weekly during the growing season (April to November), which lists planting, fruiting, and harvesting progress and overall condition of selected crops in major producing states. The data, summarized by crop and by state, are republished along with any revisions in the Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin. During the months of December through March, the report is issued monthly titled State Stories.
Description
These reports offer weekly analysis of the progress and condition of the crops. State-by-state data is provided, which is aggregated into a number that covers the key producing states that make up the majority of the US crop.
Crop Progress is measured by stages and percentage of completion. This includes percent planted, percent harvested, and several stages in between. Some of the stages vary from crop to crop. For example, intermediate stages for corn include emergence, silk, dough, dent, and maturity, while the stages for soybeans include emergence, bloom, setting pods, and dropping leaves. The reports compare the current week with the same period in the previous year and with the 5-year average.
Inclement weather in the spring can delay planting, which could ultimately lower the production for that year. For corn, producers may be forced to pick faster-growing but lower-yielding seed varieties if planting gets delayed. In some cases, they may switch to soybeans, which have a shorter growing season. If it is excessively hot and dry during the corn silking stage, yields could drop, and a delayed start to the season could push silking later in the summer and increase the odds of that happening. A key stage to watch for soybeans in pod-filling, as excessively dry weather during that stage could result in smaller beans and lower yield. If the crops are late, there is an increased chance of frost before the plants have matured, which can also reduce yield.
Crop Conditions are measured by five categories: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor and Very Poor. As a rule of thumb, analysts tend to focus on the percentage that is in the good and excellent categories (“Good/Excellent”) and to a lesser extent to “Poor/Very Poor.” The reports include data on the current week, the previous week, and a year prior.
Analysts look at the weekly conditions data during the growing season to get an idea on how the crop is performing relative to previous years. If the crop conditions are poor, analysts may want to reduce their production estimates, and vice-versa if the crop conditions are strong. Analysts may also look at individual states’ conditions in light of the weather those areas are experiencing.
Crop Progress is measured by stages and percentage of completion. This includes percent planted, percent harvested, and several stages in between. Some of the stages vary from crop to crop. For example, intermediate stages for corn include emergence, silk, dough, dent, and maturity, while the stages for soybeans include emergence, bloom, setting pods, and dropping leaves. The reports compare the current week with the same period in the previous year and with the 5-year average.
Inclement weather in the spring can delay planting, which could ultimately lower the production for that year. For corn, producers may be forced to pick faster-growing but lower-yielding seed varieties if planting gets delayed. In some cases, they may switch to soybeans, which have a shorter growing season. If it is excessively hot and dry during the corn silking stage, yields could drop, and a delayed start to the season could push silking later in the summer and increase the odds of that happening. A key stage to watch for soybeans in pod-filling, as excessively dry weather during that stage could result in smaller beans and lower yield. If the crops are late, there is an increased chance of frost before the plants have matured, which can also reduce yield.
Crop Conditions are measured by five categories: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor and Very Poor. As a rule of thumb, analysts tend to focus on the percentage that is in the good and excellent categories (“Good/Excellent”) and to a lesser extent to “Poor/Very Poor.” The reports include data on the current week, the previous week, and a year prior.
Analysts look at the weekly conditions data during the growing season to get an idea on how the crop is performing relative to previous years. If the crop conditions are poor, analysts may want to reduce their production estimates, and vice-versa if the crop conditions are strong. Analysts may also look at individual states’ conditions in light of the weather those areas are experiencing.
