| Consensus | Consensus Range | Actual | Previous | Revised | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Claims - Level | 234K | 225K to 247K | 263K | 237K | 236K |
| Initial Claims - Change | 27K | 8K | 7K | ||
| 4-Week Moving Average | 240.5K | 231K | 230.75K |
Highlights
The four-week average was up 9,750 to 240,500, with three of the four past weeks recording increases.
Higher-than-expected initial claims for the first week of September come on the back of a disappointing 22,000 increase in nonfarm payrolls in August.
Meanwhile, continuing claims stopped their retreat in lagging data for the week ended August 30, when they were steady at an elevated 1.939 million, leaving the insured unemployment rate at 1.3 percent.
Unadjusted claims rose 7,869 (4.0 percent) in the September 6 week, while seasonal factors had expected a 13,004 (6.6 percent) drop, reinforcing the argument for a weakening labor market that could force the Federal Reserve's hand at its September 16-17 meeting.
Market Consensus Before Announcement
Definition
Description
There's a downside to it, though. Unemployment claims, and therefore the number of job seekers, can fall to such a low level that businesses have a tough time finding new workers. They might have to pay overtime wages to current staff, use higher wages to lure people from other jobs, and in general spend more on labor costs because of a shortage of workers. This leads to wage inflation, which is bad news for the stock and bond markets. Federal Reserve officials are always on the look-out for inflationary pressures.
By tracking the number of jobless claims, investors can gain a sense of how tight, or how loose, the job market is. If wage inflation looks threatening, it's a good bet that interest rates will rise, bond and stock prices will fall, and the only investors in a good mood will be the ones who tracked jobless claims and adjusted their portfolios to anticipate these events.
Just remember, the lower the number of unemployment claims, the stronger the job market, and vice versa.