Overview
Single Stock futures (SSFs) mark a significant shift for individual traders who want the precision of a single stock with the structural power of a futures contract.
This case study focuses on relative value (RV) trading and shorting efficiencies when trading SSF against an index. For the sophisticated individual trader, this represents the transition from speculating on direction to "trading a relationship" and maximizing return.
By using SSFs alongside the Micro E-mini S&P 500 (MES) or Nasdaq-100 (MNQ) for example, traders can isolate a company’s performance from the noise of the broader market in either direction.
Scenario: The pure play (long stock/short index)
Individual traders often find themselves in a frustrating position: They pick the right stock, but the market (the index) starts a correction, dragging their winning pick down with it. With SSFs, you can isolate the performance of a single company, mitigating some of the overall market risk.
Setup
Suppose a trader has a bullish view on AAPL due to a new product cycle, but believes the overall technology sector, after a prolonged rally, is overbought and due for a correction.
The problem: A trader that simply buys AAPL shares is exposed to the possibility of a broad market sell-off that, theoretically, could drag down the share price of AAPL, even in an environment in which Apple’s performance was strong. If the Nasdaq-100 were to experience a 5% correction, the share price of AAPL may outperform the market and still decline by, say, 3%. Even though the trader’s view that APPL would outperform the broader market was correct, they would still be exposed to a 3% decline in P&L if they simply bought AAPL shares.
The SSF solution: The trader could buy SAAPL (Apple futures) and Short MNQ (Micro Nasdaq-100) in equivalent dollar amounts.
The mechanics
Assume the following prices:
MNQ: 29,600
SAPPL: 280
Notional Value:
MNQ = 29,600*2 = $59,200
SAAPL = 280*100 = $28,000
Therefore, a ratio of 2 SAAPL to 1 MNQ achieves similar, but not precise, notional values for the two instruments.
Hypothetically, if a trader:
Sold 1 MNQ @ 29,600 and
Bought 1 SAAPL for 280
And MNQ fell by 5% to 28,100, while SAAPL fell by 3% to 271.6
The P&L (minus fees and commissions) would be
MNQ = 1,480 point = + $2,960
SAAPL = -8.4 * 2 = - 16.8 points = -$1,680
Overall P&L = +$1,280
This is "alpha" – the value added by the stock over the index.
Other relative value scenarios
Traders can use Single Stock futures to assume a long position in one company versus a short position in another. For example, they might use SXOM0 to get long Exxon and SNVDA to get short NVDIA if they believed geopolitical considerations were more favorable for an energy-related company than technology company in the near term.
In a reversal of the MNQ versus AAPL example we went over above, a trader might have a view that the broader market might outperform a specific company, for example, Tesla, due to a belief that tariff policies could have an outsized impact on that company. They could short the STSLA futures contract and buy the MNQ or MES futures contract in a ratio that would result in similar notional values, as described above.
CME Group also lists futures on specific sectors of the economy like financial, technology, energy, etc. These futures can be used along with SSF to assume a position in a single name equity against the sector in which it is included. For example, one could use the JP Morgan Single Stock futures contract (SJPM0) and the E-mini Financial Select Sector futures contract is XAF, to gain exposure to the share price of JP Morgan versus that of the broader financial sector.
Why does this matter to individual traders?
1. Sizing versatility
With SSF, E-mini and Micro E-mini indices at CME Group, you can perfectly weigh your trade.
If your Apple SSF position is worth $60,000, you can hedge it precisely with the equivalent notional value of Micro Nasdaq contracts and vice versa (in this case ~ 2 AAPL:1 Micro Nasdaq).
2. Around-the-alock adjustments
Since both the SSF and Index futures trade 23/5, you can adjust your alpha trade at 2:00 a.m. if news breaks. You don't have to wait for the 9:30 a.m. ET New York bell to manage your relative exposure.
3. Capital efficiency
As we’ve discussed, the performance bond requirements of Single Stock futures are substantially less than similar positions in stocks or ETFs, allowing traders efficient allocation of capital among investments and trading portfolios.
4. Shorting mechanics
Shorting stocks and ETFs requires that the trader or broker locate the stock before shorting it and involves borrow costs associated with the lending of that instrument. Shorting a futures contract simply involves selling it to go short and buying it to go long; there are no locate requirements nor borrow costs.
Table 1: At-a-glance relative value strategies using Single Stock futures
|
Strategy |
Action |
Objective |
|---|---|---|
|
Relative strength |
Long SSF/short index |
Profit if the stock drops less or rises more than the market. |
|
Relative weakness |
Short SSF/long index |
Profit if the stock drops more or rises less than the market. |
|
Sector neutral |
Short SSF (Co. A)/long SSF (Co. B) |
Trade two competitors (e.g., Apple vs. Microsoft) against each other. |
Trading derivatives—including futures, options, swaps, and cleared OTC products—involves significant risk and is not suitable for all investors; as leveraged instruments, losses can exceed your initial deposit. Swaps trading is strictly limited to Eligible Contract Participants (ECPs) or those authorized under local law.
This communication is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute a prospectus, public offering, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any specific asset or service. It does not take into account your specific objectives or financial situation, and you should obtain independent professional advice before acting on this information.
The CME Group exchanges include four Designated Contract Markets (DCMs), the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc (“CME”), the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. (“CBOT”), the New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (“NYMEX”), and the Commodity Exchange, Inc. (“COMEX”). The Clearing Division of CME is a derivative clearing organization (“DCO”) for CME Group DCMs.
While CME Group strives for accuracy, it assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions, and all content is subject to and superseded by the official rulebooks of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME), Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.(CBOT), New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX), and Commodity Exchange, Inc. (COMEX).
CME Group does not represent that this material is appropriate for use in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law. Distribution elsewhere is directed exclusively to persons who have had a previous commercial relationship with CME Group or are directly and at their own initiative enquiring about the products mentioned here.
Globally, these exchanges are recognized as equivalent to EU standards under Decision (EU) 2017/2320 (MiFID II), with CME recognized as a Tier 1 third-country CCP by ESMA under EMIR. CME Group entities hold specific licenses, exemptions, or authorizations in several jurisdictions and, in some Regions, including but not limited to parts of Asia and Latin America, distribution is restricted to institutional, professional or qualified investors.
Regulated subsidiaries, such as BrokerTec and CME Amsterdam B.V., are governed by their respective authorities (FCA, AFM, SEC, FINRA).
For full regulatory details, visit cmegroup.com/disclaimer. Certain communications may be recorded for compliance purposes.
Copyright © 2026 CME Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Mailing Address: 20 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606